Educational websites whose URLs end in. However, when the information you find is a secondary source — something that was written to explain or comment on the law — you must evaluate the author's and publisher's authority, as well as their objectivity. Just because an author or publisher has a particular bias does not mean that you must reject the information without further evaluation.
Organizations that advocate for a particular point of view are frequently motivated to publish information related to their area of interest in a timely fashion. For example, an organization that files a lawsuit against a corporation or the government may make the documents in that lawsuit available on its website.
Those documents would be difficult to find on any other free website. Of course, if you find information on a website published by an organization representing one side of an issue, you must verify that the information is accurate, complete, and current. You must also distinguish between facts that can be verified and opinions presented as facts. And be cautious of any information you find from organizations that are not open about their point of view. Before you rely on information, you must be sure that it is complete and accurate.
Errors can occur even if a website is authoritative and unbiased. If you find information that is full of typographical errors and broken links, you should look for the information you need from a better source. It is always a good idea to verify any information on which you want to rely. You can do that by checking the authorities cited or linked on a web page and by finding the same information in two or more places. The importance of your legal issue will help you determine how careful you should be that the information you find is accurate. When you are doing caselaw research on a topic, you usually need to have access to all the judicial opinions from the appropriate court s , which could be federal, a specific state, or both.
The United States is a common-law system, and rulings in cases decided many years ago may still be good law if they have not been overruled, reversed, or changed by statute. When you are doing statutory research, you need to have access to all the statutes in effect.
- For More Information ON EVALUATING WEBSITES AND INFORAMTION RESOURCES;
- A Subject Guide to Quality Web Sites.
- Using the internet for research.
- Economics Subject Guide: Recommended Websites;
- What resources do you lack?.
- Functional Approach to Optimal Experimental Design: 184 (Lecture Notes in Statistics)?
This means that you should start your research in a statutory code , rather than in session laws. It also usually means that you will have to update your research with session laws passed since the last time the statutory code was updated.
A Subject Guide to Quality Web Sites by Paul R. Burden
Finally, you must evaluate legal information for currency. When was the web page you have found last updated? Primary legal information made available for free by the government is frequently out of date. You should be able to tell from a good website when it was last updated. If there is no statement about currency, you will have to find a way to be sure your information is up to date.
Chemistry: Subject websites
Type in keywords related to your topic in the search field, and see what kinds of literature comes up. Write down the call number of the book so that you can find it within your library. Google has another service, Google Books, that will help you find books related to your topic. Just type your research topic into the field and Google Books will provide you with a list of relevant books. Once you click on a book you like, Google Books will give you a preview of the book and information related to buying the book or finding it in your library.
The trick is to weed out the unreliable information. They help people with a lot of things shopping, searching for flights, comparing restaurants. The LibGuides at Rice University is one example.
- Ragnarok: The Age of Fire and Gravel;
- Technological Change and Economic Performance (Routledge Studies in Global Competition).
- Astronomy web sites;
As far as research is concerned, Google is a double-edged sword. Those may be two separate things. It provides a great deal of relevant information in a very fast manner, but that information is not necessarily credible. Content on Wikipedia can be edited by anyone—not necessarily an expert or credible author.
The editors at Wikipedia have come a long way in policing the site for bad posts and flagging items without citations; but you should always be suspect of information on the site because of its public nature. This can be particularly true when looking into certain topics, like religion and politics. Is the organization providing the information biased?
A complete guide to SEO for university websites
What incentives might the organization have for skewing the information on the site or only presenting one side of an issue? A website managed by a religious group, for instance, may only provide information that reflects positively about their religion and badly about others. Sites that have the ending. Sites that end in.